[asterisk-tech] QoS benefits of an ITSP?

Nazeer Nazeer at kryptonpcs.co.za
Mon Mar 8 09:57:51 SAST 2010


Hi Garth

 

On telkom, I get a 200ms ping but I would like it to work on the 400ms ping
and so far its working good

 

Thanks

 

From: tech-bounces at asterisk.org.za [mailto:tech-bounces at asterisk.org.za] On
Behalf Of Garth van Sittert
Sent: 08 March 2010 09:06 AM
To: Asterisk Tech
Subject: Re: [asterisk-tech] QoS benefits of an ITSP?

 

Nazeer, have you tried a different DSL account.  The DSL market (and
network) has been changing quite a bit recently, so you may find better
results with another ISP.

Garth

On 2010/03/08 08:57 AM, Frans Schneider wrote: 

You are right Steve, we should almost be able to make calls up to 800ms
ping. But I have found that when the ping is so high then it is usually a
poor line with loads of packet loss etc. But i do agree completely that if
it is just a high ping it should work.

Regards 
Frans Schneider
Senior Engineer

Ebit Technologies
www.ebit.co.za

cell: 083 267 3552
office: 021 7909 598

 Google Talk:  <http://www.images.wisestamp.com/gtalk.png> frans.schneider
Skype:  <http://www.images.wisestamp.com/skype.png> frans.schneider

 

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:54, Stephen Davies <steve at connection-telecom.com>
wrote:

Frans - I really don't agree - higjh latency just results in a call with
high delay.  Provide people accept that then there is no reason that the
high latency will have any other effects.

Regards, 

Steve

 


On 06 Mar 2010, at 10:17, Frans Schneider <frans.schneider at gmail.com> wrote:

It will never work, if i must be honest. The ping is way to high. And if the
ping is that high i am sure that many packets will get lost or arrive to
late. So there is not much u can do.

Regards 
Frans Schneider
Senior Engineer

Ebit Technologies
www.ebit.co.za

cell: 083 267 3552
office: 021 7909 598

frans.schneider frans.schneider

 

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 17:19, Nazeer <Nazeer at kryptonpcs.co.za> wrote:

 

Hi Garth

 

Below is a result of my 100 pings to India from South Africa

 

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=491ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=513ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=490ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=515ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=524ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=543ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=533ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=514ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=522ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=516ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=547ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=532ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=490ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=517ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=501ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=519ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=504ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=567ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=514ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=517ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=559ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=487ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=504ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=493ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=539ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=492ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=525ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=501ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=501ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=645ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=580ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=496ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=485ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=492ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=500ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=495ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=491ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=497ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=489ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=494ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=501ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=495ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=528ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=496ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=505ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=493ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=501ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=494ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=490ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=520ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=489ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=505ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=491ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=497ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=523ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=525ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=494ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=505ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=578ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=521ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=495ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=532ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=519ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=497ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=544ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=505ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=559ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=527ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=552ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=628ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=508ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=516ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=517ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=558ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=552ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=500ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=541ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=579ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=508ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=540ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=505ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=550ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=519ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=552ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=609ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=502ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=514ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=522ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=514ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=499ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=516ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=493ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=488ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=488ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=498ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=492ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=490ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=733ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=496ms TTL=49

Reply from 122.169.***.***: bytes=32 time=515ms TTL=49

 

Ping statistics for 122.169.***.***:

    Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 485ms, Maximum = 733ms, Average = 519ms

 

I am not using any Jitter buffer in the config on Freepbx and the phone in
using is the softphone program xlite. Will it make a difference if I had a
physical phone? Also, how do I add the jitter buffer conf in trunk setups?

 

THanks


_______________________________________________
asterisk tech mailing list
tech at asterisk.org.za
http://www.asterisk.org.za/mailman/listinfo/tech

 

_______________________________________________
asterisk tech mailing list
tech at asterisk.org.za
http://www.asterisk.org.za/mailman/listinfo/tech


_______________________________________________
asterisk tech mailing list
tech at asterisk.org.za
http://www.asterisk.org.za/mailman/listinfo/tech





 
 
_______________________________________________
asterisk tech mailing list
tech at asterisk.org.za
http://www.asterisk.org.za/mailman/listinfo/tech



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4923 (20100307) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://asterisk.org.za/pipermail/tech/attachments/20100308/e016760c/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the tech mailing list